<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privilege</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/</link>
	<description>Yes, this is where we live.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hans</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>I was going to reply: "could you tell them most people have a hard time 'working hard' because they don't have a place to 'work' at all?", but eli just nailed it.

I shut up and bugger off! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to reply: &#8220;could you tell them most people have a hard time &#8216;working hard&#8217; because they don&#8217;t have a place to &#8216;work&#8217; at all?&#8221;, but eli just nailed it.</p>
<p>I shut up and bugger off! <img src='http://www.lunaticleft.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eli</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>heh heh. yeah, i was being ironically pretentious with that lacan reference. somebody just told me that shit yesterday.  but i'm also getting that dickface theory from lacan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh heh. yeah, i was being ironically pretentious with that lacan reference. somebody just told me that shit yesterday.  but i&#8217;m also getting that dickface theory from lacan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vijay</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>wow, that's some shit I actually agree with.  well, except for the lacan reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, that&#8217;s some shit I actually agree with.  well, except for the lacan reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eli</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Simple argument: success tends to happens only in an environment that is socially supportive of success.  If people are not surrounded by others who value the skills necessary for success and who do not practice and learn those skills, then the are not going to value or practice those skills themselves.  I'd argue that the underlying problem that prevents dickfaces from understanding the fallacy of meritocracy is that they have a view of the Self as an isolated, autonomous individual being.  If they would instead decenter the self and see personal identity as constituted through interaction with and recognition by others (because of the gap between subject and individual - cf. Lacan), then they would understand that the self cannot simply pull itself up by the bootstraps into success but rather must interact with others who also value and practice successful habits.  I.e., meritocracy ignores the vicious cycles of poverty and poor education/family environment.  P.s. people who believe America is meritocratic are dickfaces (i.e., they use their own dicks as a model for their personal identities, and then they jerk themselves off their whole lives.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple argument: success tends to happens only in an environment that is socially supportive of success.  If people are not surrounded by others who value the skills necessary for success and who do not practice and learn those skills, then the are not going to value or practice those skills themselves.  I&#8217;d argue that the underlying problem that prevents dickfaces from understanding the fallacy of meritocracy is that they have a view of the Self as an isolated, autonomous individual being.  If they would instead decenter the self and see personal identity as constituted through interaction with and recognition by others (because of the gap between subject and individual - cf. Lacan), then they would understand that the self cannot simply pull itself up by the bootstraps into success but rather must interact with others who also value and practice successful habits.  I.e., meritocracy ignores the vicious cycles of poverty and poor education/family environment.  P.s. people who believe America is meritocratic are dickfaces (i.e., they use their own dicks as a model for their personal identities, and then they jerk themselves off their whole lives.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaticleft.com/2007/09/13/privilege/#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>Exhibit lots of counterexamples? 17 should do the trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exhibit lots of counterexamples? 17 should do the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.232 seconds -->
