Religion & Whatnot
Fundamentalists do not read the bible. Sure, they read it constantly and frequently attend bible studies. But they clearly are not actually reading it as a work, I suspect most read it piece meal and apply each chunk, out of context, to their own lives. I have not yet attended a fundamentalist “bible study” but I have a strong suspicion that study is mostly indoctrination. They read a short passage then discuss it, with discussion led by someone who knows the correct interpretation of the passage at hand.
A commenter at pandagon brought up Martin Luther and the reformation, specifically how Luther rejected this hierarchical view of religion (at least until his followers stopped listening to him). The interesting thing to me about biblical literalism is that it real is a very new phenomenon. Religious objection to science is not, but the idea that the bible is the literal truth was rejected by Augustine himself, the philosophical father of both the Catholic and Protestant churches. Luther and Calvin were both heavily influenced by his writing. I am on the bus right now, away from internet so I can’t do more research on the origin of biblical literalism, but I suspect it is post-great awakening. I would guess 20th century, but I need to look into it.
The bible says a lot of things, some of which contradict each other. It was this contradiction that caused Augustine himself to doubt. He later realized (according to Confessions) that only the ill informed try to read the bible as a literal, rather than spiritual truth.
