Oh yes its true

I was going to say something about this salon article. But pandagon said something better then I could in my 0 hits a day blog:

Another big factor in all of this is that historically speaking, men really have been encouraged to seek identity through being superior to other people and this is an option that’s just not realistic anymore for your everyday man. In the past, men could count on being superior to women, being both the boss of and the protector of the women in his life. Women’s financial independence has basically pissed that away for a lot of men. The other option offered to men in our society is to Be Somebody–an athlete or rock star or something–and that’s just not within most people’s reach. Getting involved in your everyday life and finding meaning from that is sort of disdained in our culture. Taken altogeher, it’s easy to see why there’s a lot of ennui and alienation in American men.

I think this hits the nail on the head. I went to a very fancy film school, and I met a lot of men who were completely positive they were going to be the next Spielberg or David Fincher or whatever. There are usually about two annual openings for succesful entertainment moguls, and probably hundreds of thousands of film students graduating every year. These are men that were told in high school they were going to be the next best thing. Even in college they might keep that illusion up. But by the time they are in their mid to late twenties it becomes clear that they aren’t going to ever be that succesful. And its a hard thing to know that you’re going to have to find a reason for living beyond being an amazing success.

I meet a lot of men my age (mid-twenties) that basically don’t work, or if they do they don’t work hard. Because nothing is ever good enough for them. They want that job that will recognize their genius.

In my anecdotal experience career-minded women tend to be a little more practical. Perhaps it because, as Amanda said, the fact that they can have a career is reward enough after a century of being expected to sit and home and darn socks. I suspect that it may also be because all that encouragement that boys get in high school is not given to girls. High achieving girls often still get little reward other than the proverbial hearty handshake, whereas the high achieving (middle class white) boys are seen with “potential for greatness” (or they get completely written off). They are showered with praise. They get special attention. And everyone tells them how great they will be. One day, after years of odd jobs,traveling to china and working abroad (or maybe after two semesters of college), they realize that they are not going to be great writers or film makers or singer/songwriters. And then they just sort of freeze up. The great direction of their lives is taken away.

Of course, maybe everything I wrote is a bunch of crap. But I think there is something there with the listless twenty-something white males who can’t seem to get their shit together. I even feel the pull myself.

4 Responses to “Oh yes its true

  • 1
    Paul
    September 21st, 2005 06:31

    I checked out this post after your trackback to an Atrios post.

    I don’t think what you wrote is crap at all. I think it’s pretty much on-target, especially the sentence, “And its a hard thing to know that you’re going to have to find a reason for living beyond being an amazing success.”

    I find myself in the same rut — life only offers fleeting chances at realizing your dreams, and once you realize that those moments HAVE passed you by, you DO sort of freeze up, and the “great direction” of your life IS taken away. Sure, there is the opportunity to realize them later on, but it’s obvious that it gets harder and harder, often due to the fickle whims of the marketplace.

    The only advice I can give as a 35-year old is to prioritize your “directions”, and as much as possible try to be as on-target with your genuine feelings and aspirations as much as possible. If you still want to be a well-regarded director, you could always go the indie route. Soderberg and Tarantino started to take off in their mid-to-late 20’s, after all.

    Really, just be true to thine own self.

    More debate on this here:
    http://salon.com/books/letters/2005/09/20/kunkel/index.html

  • 2
    Stephen
    September 21st, 2005 08:28

    I read those letters…that is a great salon conversation. I really think this is related to an inherant sexism in education, and I suppose it serves us privledged white men right to suffer through a little ennui. That’s right. even if you put your mind to it you can’t actually be whatever you want to be.

  • 3
    Antigone
    September 21st, 2005 10:11

    I guess that makes me a guy then. After being told all of my life that I’m going to be a success, and now hitting college and hitting the realization that I’m probably not, I feel really apathetic on continuing.

  • 4
    Stephen
    September 21st, 2005 11:54

    Not knowing you Antigone, its hard to say. I think what is difficult in this day and age is that I think a great many young people have a pretty inflated idea of what constitutes successful. I have a good paying job and I generally nice life, but by the standards I measured things by in college that makes me a failure. Success then was in my mind MEGA success, the kind that causes people to write biographies about you.

Leave a Reply